Seat Alhambra 1996 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.2 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is a more dynamic driving. Seat Alhambra engine produces 27 HP less power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Citroen C4 Picasso. Due to the lower power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 5.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 | 8.0 | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Alhambra consumes 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 525 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 580'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Alhambra engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 407, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
| Seat Alhambra is 15 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.4 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Alhambra has serious deffects in 415 percent more cases than Citroen C4 Picasso, so Citroen C4 Picasso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |