Seat Alhambra 1996 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 162 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is a more dynamic driving. Seat Alhambra engine produces 4 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, but torque is 8 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Runner. Due to the lower power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 8.8 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Alhambra consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 580'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Alhambra engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Runner might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is larger. Seat Alhambra is 35 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, 11 cm wider, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 676 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1498 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 1.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |