Seat Alhambra 1996 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 275 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is a more dynamic driving. Seat Alhambra engine produces 40 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 105 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Due to the lower power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 13.3 | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Alhambra consumes 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 510 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 580'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Dodge Grand Caravan, Chrysler Concorde | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is smaller. Seat Alhambra is 45 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 671 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4880 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |