Seat Alhambra 1998 vs Volkswagen Sharan 1997
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 235 NM | 235 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.1 seconds | 19.1 seconds | |
Seat Alhambra and Volkswagen Sharan have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.8 | |
Seat Alhambra consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
1110 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 560'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 4 years | 4 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.62 m | 4.62 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra and Volkswagen Sharan are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.7 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | low | |
Volkswagen Sharan has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Alhambra, so Volkswagen Sharan quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1600 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |