Seat Alhambra 1998 vs Seat Alhambra 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.1 seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
|
Seat Alhambra 2000 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Alhambra 1998 engine produces 5 HP less power than Seat Alhambra 2000, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Seat Alhambra 2000. Due to the lower power, Seat Alhambra 1998 reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.2 | |
|
The Seat Alhambra 2000 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Alhambra 1998 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra 2000, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra 1998 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| Seat Alhambra 2000 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra 1998 is 1 cm shorter than the Seat Alhambra 2000, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Alhambra 1998 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 256 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra 1998 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra 2000. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |