Seat Alhambra 1998 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 235 NM | 205 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.1 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
Seat Alhambra engine produces 20 HP more power than Citroen Xsara Picasso, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Citroen Xsara Picasso. Despite the higher power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 5.5 | |
The Citroen Xsara Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Alhambra consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
1110 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
Citroen Xsara Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.62 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.73 m | 1.64 m | |
Seat Alhambra is larger. Seat Alhambra is 34 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 6 cm wider, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 9 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 550 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`850 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1600 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |