Seat Alhambra 1998 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 138 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.1 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is a more dynamic driving. Seat Alhambra engine produces 28 HP less power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Citroen C4 Picasso. Due to the lower power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.1 | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Alhambra consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
| Seat Alhambra is 15 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.4 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Alhambra has serious deffects in 415 percent more cases than Citroen C4 Picasso, so Citroen C4 Picasso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |