Seat Alhambra 1997 vs Volkswagen Sharan 1997

 
Seat Alhambra
1997 - 2000
Volkswagen Sharan
1997 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 110 HP90 HP
Torque: 235 NM202 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.4 seconds19.3 seconds
Seat Alhambra is more dynamic to drive.
Seat Alhambra engine produces 20 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 33 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Thanks to more power Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.46.6
Real fuel consumption: 6.2 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Alhambra consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1090 km in combined cycle1130 km in combined cycle
1340 km on highway1380 km on highway
1120 km with real consumption1080 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.62 m4.62 m
Width: 1.81 m1.81 m
Height: 1.73 m1.73 m
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra and Volkswagen Sharan are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters11.7 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`0002`000
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

low
Volkswagen Sharan has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Alhambra, so Volkswagen Sharan quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 16001000
Pros and Cons: Seat Alhambra has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv