Seat Alhambra 1996 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.3 seconds | 14.7 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is a more dynamic driving. Seat Alhambra engine produces 25 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 108 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Due to the lower power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 11.2 | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Alhambra consumes 4.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 705 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 1320 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Seat Alhambra 1996 1.9 engine: This engine stands out for its durability and generally remains trouble-free until it has been used extensively over many years. Despite its robust construction, the wear and tear from prolonged use, ... More about Seat Alhambra 1996 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra is 1 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Volkswagen Sharan has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Alhambra, so Volkswagen Sharan quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |