Seat Alhambra 1996 vs Opel Mokka 2012
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.3 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Opel Mokka is a more dynamic driving. Seat Alhambra engine produces 40 HP less power than Opel Mokka, whereas torque is 98 NM less than Opel Mokka. Due to the lower power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 9.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Mokka is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Alhambra consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1320 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Seat Alhambra 1996 1.9 engine: This engine stands out for its durability and generally remains trouble-free until it has been used extensively over many years. Despite its robust construction, the wear and tear from prolonged use, ... More about Seat Alhambra 1996 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is larger. Seat Alhambra is 34 cm longer than the Opel Mokka, 3 cm wider, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 256 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 256 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
852 litres | 1372 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 520 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.9 metres more than that of the Opel Mokka, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`400 kg | 1`959 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`678 kg | 1`490 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 722 kg | 469 kg | |
| Seat Alhambra load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 35 procentiem more than Opel Mokka. Therefore, Seat Alhambra is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |