Seat Alhambra 1996 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.3 seconds | 17.8 seconds | |
| Seat Alhambra engine produces 8 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Despite the higher power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 8.1 | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Alhambra consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Seat Alhambra 1996 1.9 engine: This engine stands out for its durability and generally remains trouble-free until it has been used extensively over many years. Despite its robust construction, the wear and tear from prolonged use, ... More about Seat Alhambra 1996 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.58 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is larger. Seat Alhambra is 12 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 11 cm wider, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 212 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 212 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1714 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Alhambra has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, so Mitsubishi Space Wagon quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |