Seat Alhambra 1996 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.3 seconds | 17.8 seconds | |
| Seat Alhambra engine produces 8 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Runner. Despite the higher power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 8.1 | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Alhambra consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 1320 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is larger. Seat Alhambra is 35 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, 11 cm wider, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 676 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1498 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 1.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |