Seat Alhambra 1996 vs Ford Galaxy 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 202 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.3 seconds | 17.1 seconds | |
| Seat Alhambra and Ford Galaxy have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1320 km on highway | 1410 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 1110 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra and Ford Galaxy are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Seat Alhambra has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Galaxy, so Seat Alhambra quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |