Seat Alhambra 1996 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 262 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.3 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is a more dynamic driving. Seat Alhambra engine produces 24 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Due to the lower power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Alhambra consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1320 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Alhambra engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Audi A6, Volkswagen Golf, Audi 80, Volkswagen Vento | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Seat Alhambra 1996 1.9 engine: This engine stands out for its durability and generally remains trouble-free until it has been used extensively over many years. Despite its robust construction, the wear and tear from prolonged use, ... More about Seat Alhambra 1996 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is smaller. Seat Alhambra is 45 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 671 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4880 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |