Seat Alhambra 1996 vs Toyota Picnic 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.3 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
|
Toyota Picnic is a more dynamic driving. Seat Alhambra and Toyota Picnic have the same engine power, but Seat Alhambra torque is 3 NM less than Toyota Picnic. Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 5.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Alhambra consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1320 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Seat Alhambra 1996 1.9 engine: This engine stands out for its durability and generally remains trouble-free until it has been used extensively over many years. Despite its robust construction, the wear and tear from prolonged use, ... More about Seat Alhambra 1996 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is larger. Seat Alhambra is 9 cm longer than the Toyota Picnic, 11 cm wider, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1840 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Picnic, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Alhambra has serious deffects in 365 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |