Seat Alhambra 1996 vs Opel Combo 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Seat Alhambra) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Opel Combo) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 103 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Seat Alhambra engine produces 30 HP more power than Opel Combo, whereas torque is 99 NM more than Opel Combo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Seat Alhambra 1996 1.9 engine: This engine stands out for its durability and generally remains trouble-free until it has been used extensively over many years. Despite its robust construction, the wear and tear from prolonged use, ... More about Seat Alhambra 1996 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Opel Combo has
| |