Seat Alhambra 1996 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 138 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.3 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is a more dynamic driving. Seat Alhambra engine produces 48 HP less power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 68 NM less than Citroen C4 Picasso. Due to the lower power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 6.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Seat Alhambra 1996 1.9 engine: This engine stands out for its durability and generally remains trouble-free until it has been used extensively over many years. Despite its robust construction, the wear and tear from prolonged use, ... More about Seat Alhambra 1996 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
| Seat Alhambra is 15 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.4 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Alhambra has serious deffects in 415 percent more cases than Citroen C4 Picasso, so Citroen C4 Picasso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |