Seat Alhambra 2000 vs Opel Mokka 2012
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Seat Alhambra engine produces 10 HP more power than Opel Mokka, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Opel Mokka. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 54 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is larger. Seat Alhambra is 34 cm longer than the Opel Mokka, 3 cm wider, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1372 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.9 metres more than that of the Opel Mokka, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`926 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |