Seat Alhambra 2000 vs Toyota Previa 2001
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Petrol engines (Seat Alhambra) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Toyota Previa) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 116 HP | |
Torque: | 210 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
Seat Alhambra engine produces 34 HP more power than Toyota Previa, but torque is 40 NM less than Toyota Previa. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.2 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Toyota Previa 2001 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota Previa 2001 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.62 m | 4.75 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.73 m | 1.77 m | |
Seat Alhambra is 13 cm shorter than the Toyota Previa, 2 cm wider, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 495 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2370 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Previa, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1600 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
| |