Seat Alhambra 1998 vs Volkswagen Sharan 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Seat Alhambra and Volkswagen Sharan have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 10.9 | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Alhambra consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| Volkswagen Sharan 1998 1.8 engine: The weakest link in this engine is the turbine, whose failure is contributed to by a faulty catalytic converter. The oil pump and chain tensioner also tend to have problems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra and Volkswagen Sharan are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Volkswagen Sharan has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Alhambra, so Volkswagen Sharan quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |