Seat Alhambra 1998 vs Opel Mokka 2012

 
Seat Alhambra
1998 - 2000
Opel Mokka
2012 - 2016
Body: Minivan / MPVCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP140 HP
Torque: 210 NM175 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds10.9 seconds
Seat Alhambra engine produces 10 HP more power than Opel Mokka, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Opel Mokka. Despite the higher power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.17.1
The Opel Mokka is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Seat Alhambra consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 450 litres more fuel.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.62 m4.28 m
Width: 1.81 m1.78 m
Height: 1.73 m1.66 m
Seat Alhambra is larger.
Seat Alhambra is 34 cm longer than the Opel Mokka, 3 cm wider, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 7 cm higher.
Seats: 7 seats5 seats
Trunk capacity: 256 litres54 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 256 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: no data54 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1597 litres1372 litres
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Alhambra (by 225 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.9 metres more than that of the Opel Mokka, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight: 2`400 kg1`839 kg
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

high
Average price (€): 16007000
Pros and Cons: Seat Alhambra has
  • more power
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Opel Mokka has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • electric power steering
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv