Seat Alhambra 1998 vs Mercedes Vito 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
|
Seat Alhambra is more dynamic to drive. Seat Alhambra engine produces 7 HP more power than Mercedes Vito, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 11.6 | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Alhambra consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes Vito, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is smaller. Seat Alhambra is 4 cm shorter than the Mercedes Vito, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mercedes Vito, which means Seat Alhambra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
| |