Seat Alhambra 1998 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Seat Alhambra is more dynamic to drive. Seat Alhambra engine produces 35 HP more power than Citroen Xsara Picasso, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Citroen Xsara Picasso. Thanks to more power Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 7.7 | |
|
The Citroen Xsara Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Alhambra consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 360 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is larger. Seat Alhambra is 34 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 6 cm wider, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |