Seat Alhambra 1998 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Seat Alhambra is more dynamic to drive. Seat Alhambra engine produces 25 HP more power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Citroen C4 Picasso. Thanks to more power Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 8.0 | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Alhambra consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
| Seat Alhambra is 15 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.4 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Alhambra has serious deffects in 415 percent more cases than Citroen C4 Picasso, so Citroen C4 Picasso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |