Seat Alhambra 2004 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.8 Petrol | 2.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 204 HP | 204 HP | |
Torque: | 265 NM | 265 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
Seat Alhambra and Volkswagen Sharan have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 11.2 | |
Seat Alhambra consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
800 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.76 m | 1.73 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra and Volkswagen Sharan are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | low | |
Seat Alhambra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Seat Alhambra, so Seat Alhambra quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 2400 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
| |