Seat Alhambra 2000 vs Ford Galaxy 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Petrol | 2.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 268 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
| Seat Alhambra and Ford Galaxy have the same engine power, but Seat Alhambra torque is 3 NM less than Ford Galaxy. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.9 | 11.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.73 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Alhambra is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Ford Galaxy has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Alhambra, so Ford Galaxy quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |