Seat Alhambra 2000 vs Ford Galaxy 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 208 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Seat Alhambra is more dynamic to drive. Seat Alhambra engine produces 43 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 57 NM more than Ford Galaxy. Thanks to more power Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.9 | 9.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.3 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Alhambra consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Alhambra is 19 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 256 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 256 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2610 litres | 2325 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Ford Galaxy has more luggage space (by 134 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Alhambra (by 285 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`470 kg | 2`415 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`652 kg | 1`625 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 818 kg | 790 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Ford Galaxy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Alhambra has serious deffects in 305 percent more cases than Ford Galaxy, so Ford Galaxy quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |
