Seat Alhambra 2005 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 310 NM | 310 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
Seat Alhambra and Volkswagen Sharan have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Alhambra consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
930 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.76 m | 1.73 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra and Volkswagen Sharan are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 256 litres | 256 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | low | |
Seat Alhambra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Seat Alhambra, so Seat Alhambra quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 2400 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |