Seat Alhambra 2004 vs Ford Galaxy 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 203 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.2 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is a more dynamic driving. Seat Alhambra engine produces 30 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 33 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Due to the lower power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Alhambra consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.73 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Alhambra is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 256 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Seat Alhambra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 360 percent more cases than Seat Alhambra, so Seat Alhambra quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |