Seat Alhambra 2004 vs Ford Galaxy 2003

 
Seat Alhambra
2004 - 2010
Ford Galaxy
2003 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 115 HP115 HP
Torque: 170 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.2 seconds15.4 seconds
Seat Alhambra and Ford Galaxy have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.410.1
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Seat Alhambra consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 740 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle
Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.64 m
Width: 1.81 m1.81 m
Height: 1.76 m1.73 m
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Alhambra is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 256 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8001`800
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

below average
Seat Alhambra has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Seat Alhambra, so Seat Alhambra quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 24002000
Pros and Cons: Seat Alhambra has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Ford Galaxy has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv