Seat Alhambra 2004 vs Ford Galaxy 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 170 NM | 170 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.2 seconds | 15.4 seconds | |
Seat Alhambra and Ford Galaxy have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 10.1 | |
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Alhambra consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.76 m | 1.73 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Alhambra is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 256 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`800 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | below average | |
Seat Alhambra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Seat Alhambra, so Seat Alhambra quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2400 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |