Seat Alhambra 2004 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.2 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is a more dynamic driving. Seat Alhambra engine produces 28 HP less power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Citroen C4 Picasso. Due to the lower power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 8.0 | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Alhambra consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
| Seat Alhambra is 16 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 256 litres | 500 litres | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Seat Alhambra has 244 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. This could mean that the Seat Alhambra uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.6 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |