Seat Alhambra 2003 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 138 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Seat Alhambra is more dynamic to drive. Seat Alhambra engine produces 8 HP less power than Citroen C4 Picasso, but torque is 40 NM more than Citroen C4 Picasso. Despite less power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Alhambra consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.68 m | |
| Seat Alhambra is 16 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 256 litres | 500 litres | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Seat Alhambra has 244 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. This could mean that the Seat Alhambra uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.6 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Alhambra has serious deffects in 295 percent more cases than Citroen C4 Picasso, so Citroen C4 Picasso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |