Seat Alhambra 2004 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 310 NM | 310 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
Seat Alhambra and Volkswagen Sharan have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.2 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
850 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.76 m | 1.73 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra and Volkswagen Sharan are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 256 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | low | |
Seat Alhambra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Seat Alhambra, so Seat Alhambra quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 2400 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |