Seat Alhambra 2004 vs Ford Galaxy 2007
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 130 HP | |
Torque: | 310 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
Ford Galaxy is a more dynamic driving. Seat Alhambra engine produces 15 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Due to the lower power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Alhambra consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
850 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
Ford Galaxy 2007 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford Galaxy 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.82 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
Seat Alhambra is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Alhambra is 19 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 256 litres | 390 litres | |
Ford Galaxy has more luggage space. Seat Alhambra has 134 litres less trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`505 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Ford Galaxy has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Alhambra, so Ford Galaxy quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 2400 | 3600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |