Seat Alhambra 2000 vs Ford Galaxy 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is a more dynamic driving. Seat Alhambra engine produces 15 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Due to the lower power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Alhambra consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ford Galaxy 2007 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford Galaxy 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Alhambra is 19 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 256 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 256 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2610 litres | 2325 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Ford Galaxy has more luggage space (by 134 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Alhambra (by 285 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`510 kg | 2`505 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`682 kg | 1`735 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 828 kg | 770 kg | |
| Seat Alhambra load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 7 procentiem more than Ford Galaxy. Therefore, Seat Alhambra is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Ford Galaxy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Alhambra has serious deffects in 305 percent more cases than Ford Galaxy, so Ford Galaxy quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |