Seat Alhambra 2000 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 138 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is a more dynamic driving. Seat Alhambra engine produces 23 HP less power than Citroen C4 Picasso, but torque is 40 NM more than Citroen C4 Picasso. Due to the lower power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Alhambra consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
| Seat Alhambra is 16 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 256 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 256 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2610 litres | 1734 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Alhambra (by 876 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.6 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`510 kg | 2`140 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`682 kg | 1`581 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 828 kg | 559 kg | |
| Seat Alhambra load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 32 procentiem more than Citroen C4 Picasso. Therefore, Seat Alhambra is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Alhambra has serious deffects in 295 percent more cases than Citroen C4 Picasso, so Citroen C4 Picasso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |