Seat Alhambra 2000 vs Ford Galaxy 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 310 NM | 310 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
Seat Alhambra and Ford Galaxy have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.3 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
970 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.76 m | 1.73 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Alhambra is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 256 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | low | |
Ford Galaxy has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Alhambra, so Ford Galaxy quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 2400 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |