Seat Alhambra 2000 vs Ford Galaxy 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 17.2 seconds | |
|
Seat Alhambra is more dynamic to drive. Seat Alhambra engine produces 25 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Ford Galaxy. Thanks to more power Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km with real consumption | 1110 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.73 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Alhambra is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 256 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Ford Galaxy has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Alhambra, so Ford Galaxy quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |