Seat Alhambra 2000 vs Ford Galaxy 2003

 
Seat Alhambra
2000 - 2004
Ford Galaxy
2003 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 115 HP130 HP
Torque: 310 NM310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.7 seconds12.8 seconds
Ford Galaxy is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Alhambra engine produces 15 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.36.2
Real fuel consumption: 7.2 l/100km7.2 l/100km
By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1110 km in combined cycle1120 km in combined cycle
970 km with real consumption970 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.64 m
Width: 1.81 m1.81 m
Height: 1.76 m1.73 m
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Alhambra is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 256 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0002`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

low
Ford Galaxy has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Alhambra, so Ford Galaxy quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 24002000
Pros and Cons:
    Ford Galaxy has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • better manoeuvrability
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv