Seat Alhambra 2000 vs Chrysler Voyager 1999
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 114 HP | |
Torque: | 310 NM | 262 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
Seat Alhambra is more dynamic to drive. Seat Alhambra engine produces 1 HP more power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 48 NM more than Chrysler Voyager. Thanks to more power Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 9.2 | |
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Alhambra consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.73 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.92 m | |
Height: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
Seat Alhambra is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Alhambra is 10 cm shorter than the Chrysler Voyager, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 256 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.4 metres more than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | low | |
Seat Alhambra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler Voyager has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Seat Alhambra, so Seat Alhambra quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2400 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |