Seat Alhambra 2000 vs Toyota Picnic 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
|
Seat Alhambra is more dynamic to drive. Seat Alhambra engine produces 25 HP more power than Toyota Picnic, whereas torque is 105 NM more than Toyota Picnic. Thanks to more power Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Alhambra consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is larger. Seat Alhambra is 10 cm longer than the Toyota Picnic, 11 cm wider, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 256 litres | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1840 litres | |
|
Seat Alhambra has more luggage capacity. Seat Alhambra has 76 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.9 metres more than that of the Toyota Picnic, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Alhambra has serious deffects in 365 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |