Seat Alhambra 2000 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Seat Alhambra engine produces 15 HP less power than Renault Grand Scenic, but torque is 10 NM more than Renault Grand Scenic. Due to the lower power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.0 | |
| Seat Alhambra consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.64 m | |
| Seat Alhambra is 13 cm longer than the Renault Grand Scenic, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Alhambra is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 256 litres | 533 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 533 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 256 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1960 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 1.2 metres more than that of the Renault Grand Scenic, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`195 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Renault Grand Scenic has
| |