Seat Alhambra 2000 vs Nissan Serena 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Nissan Serena is a more dynamic driving. Seat Alhambra engine produces 35 HP less power than Nissan Serena, but torque is 30 NM more than Nissan Serena. Due to the lower power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is larger, but lower. Seat Alhambra is 11 cm longer than the Nissan Serena, 12 cm wider, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 256 litres | 520 litres | |
|
Nissan Serena has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Seat Alhambra has 264 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Serena. This could mean that the Seat Alhambra uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Nissan Serena has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Alhambra has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Nissan Serena, so Nissan Serena quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Serena has
| |