Seat Alhambra 2004 vs Ford Galaxy 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Seat Alhambra engine produces 5 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Ford Galaxy. Despite the higher power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 8.2 | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Alhambra consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Alhambra is 19 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 256 litres | 308 litres | |
|
Ford Galaxy has more luggage space. Seat Alhambra has 52 litres less trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Ford Galaxy has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Alhambra, so Ford Galaxy quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |