Seat Alhambra 2000 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Seat Alhambra and Volkswagen Sharan have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 10.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Volkswagen Sharan 2000 1.8 engine: The weakest link in this engine is the turbine, whose failure is contributed to by a faulty catalytic converter. The oil pump and chain tensioner also tend to have problems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.73 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra and Volkswagen Sharan are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 256 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 256 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2610 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`480 kg | 1`900 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |