Seat Alhambra 2011 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010

 
Seat Alhambra
2011 - 2015
Volkswagen Sharan
2010 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 200 HP200 HP
Torque: 280 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.3 seconds8.3 seconds
Seat Alhambra and Volkswagen Sharan have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.48.4
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 830 km in combined cycle830 km in combined cycle
1060 km on highway1060 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.85 m4.85 m
Width: 1.90 m1.90 m
Height: 1.72 m1.74 m
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra and Volkswagen Sharan are practically the same length.
Seats: 5 seats7 seats
Trunk capacity: 809 litres300 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data300 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 809 litres885 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
2430 litres2297 litres
In 5-seat version Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage space (by 76 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Alhambra (by 133 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters11.9 meters
Gross weight: 2`530 kg2`360 kg
Net weight:1`769 kg1`790 kg
Load capacity:761 kg570 kg
Seat Alhambra load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 25 procentiem more than Volkswagen Sharan. Therefore, Seat Alhambra is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety:
Quality:
low

low
Seat Alhambra has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Sharan, so Seat Alhambra quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 900010 800
Pros and Cons: Seat Alhambra has
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv