Seat Alhambra 2011 vs Ford Galaxy 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 345 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
| Seat Alhambra engine produces 40 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Despite less power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Alhambra consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.75 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra is 1 cm longer than the Ford Galaxy, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 300 litres | |
|
Ford Galaxy has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Seat Alhambra has 33 litres less trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. This could mean that the Seat Alhambra uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`360 | 2`585 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Galaxy is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Seat Alhambra has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Galaxy, so Seat Alhambra quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |