Seat Alhambra 2011 vs Ford S-Max 2010
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 200 HP | 203 HP | |
Torque: | 280 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
Seat Alhambra engine produces 3 HP less power than Ford S-Max, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Ford S-Max. Despite less power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 8.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Alhambra consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
1060 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
670 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.85 m | 4.77 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.72 m | 1.66 m | |
Seat Alhambra is larger. Seat Alhambra is 8 cm longer than the Ford S-Max, 2 cm wider, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 6 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 285 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 285 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 267 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2000 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford S-Max. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`360 | 2`400 | |
Safety: | |||
Ford S-Max is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
Quality: | low | low | |
Ford S-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Alhambra has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Ford S-Max, so Ford S-Max quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 11 800 | 6800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford S-Max has
| |