Seat Alhambra 2010 vs Mazda 5 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Seat Alhambra is more dynamic to drive. Seat Alhambra engine produces 55 HP more power than Mazda 5, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Mazda 5. Thanks to more power Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Alhambra consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 470'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3, Skoda Superb | Used also on Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is larger. Seat Alhambra is 27 cm longer than the Mazda 5, 15 cm wider, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 112 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 112 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 267 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1485 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 1.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 5, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`370 | 2`125 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Mazda 5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Alhambra has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Mazda 5, so Mazda 5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Mazda 5 has
| |