Seat Alhambra 2010 vs Ford S-Max 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Seat Alhambra engine produces 7 HP more power than Ford S-Max, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Ford S-Max. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Ford S-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Alhambra consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1400 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is larger. Seat Alhambra is 8 cm longer than the Ford S-Max, 2 cm wider, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 285 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 267 litres | 285 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1339 litres | 2000 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Ford S-Max has more luggage space (by 18 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max (by 661 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`530 kg | 2`505 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`842 kg | 1`690 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 688 kg | 815 kg | |
| Seat Alhambra load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem less than Ford S-Max. Therefore, Ford S-Max is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Ford S-Max is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Ford S-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Alhambra has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Ford S-Max, so Ford S-Max quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford S-Max has
| |